Can the concepts of Umwelt and Telos help us to understand our horses better?

Anyone who has engaged with my posts, podcasts or research articles will likely have heard me use the word umwelt to convey the idea that we need to try and understand the world from the horses perspective, intentions and lived experience.

In my podcast with Bonny Mealand and Emily Kieson, Bonny used the term telos and I thought it would be useful to expand on what both these terms mean and why they are important in helping us to move away from an anthropomorphic perspective and toward a greater understanding of the experiences of our horses as horses.

Listen to my podcast with Bonny and Emily (The importance of agency and relationships: A conversation about enhancing the wellbeing of our horses with Bonny Mealand and Emily Kieson).

The concepts of umwelt and telos originate from different fields of study and have distinct meanings.

Umwelt:

Umwelt, a term popularised by biologist Jakob von Uexküll, refers to the unique subjective world experienced by an organism based on its sensory capabilities and interactions with the environment.

It emphasises the idea that different species perceive and interact with their surroundings in unique ways shaped by their sensory organs, cognitive abilities, and behavioural predispositions, and intentions. While an individual’s Umwelt is influenced by its evolution as a species, it is also shaped by individual experience and learning.

For example, the umwelt of a bee includes perceptions of ultraviolet light and patterns of polarised light, which are crucial for finding nectar and communicating with other bees through dance language. Where are bee lives and how it interacts with other bees will influence individuals. The umwelt concept highlights the diversity of sensory worlds and the importance of understanding an organism’s perspective to comprehend its behaviour and ecological role.

How does Umwelt relate to affordance perception?

Umwelt refers to the specific perceptual world experienced by an organism, shaped by its sensory capacities and biological needs. From a Gibsonian perspective in ecological psychology, affordance perception relates to how an organism perceives its environment in terms of potential actions or interactions it can undertake. The link between umwelt and affordance perception lies in the idea that an organism’s sensory modalities and biological makeup determine which affordances are relevant. For example, a horse might perceive a fence as an obstacle to navigate, while a bird might see it as a perch. Thus, the umwelt influences how different species interpret their surroundings, highlighting that perception is not merely a passive reception of stimuli but an active engagement with an environment rich in meaning based on individual capabilities and ecological contexts.

Telos:

Telos, derived from ancient Greek philosophy, refers to the inherent purpose, goal, or end towards which something naturally tends. It is often associated with teleology, the study of purpose or design in nature.

In teleological thinking, phenomena are interpreted in terms of their final causes or intended outcomes. For instance, in Aristotelian thought, the telos of an acorn is to become an oak tree. Telos can also be applied to human actions and institutions, such as the telos of education being the cultivation of knowledge and critical thinking skills.

The concept of telos raises questions about intentionality, design, and the underlying purposes that shape the behaviour and development of organisms and systems.

In summary, while both concepts explore aspects of purpose and perception, umwelt focuses on the subjective sensory worlds of organisms and how they perceive their environments, whereas telos examines inherent goals or purposes guiding the behaviour and development of entities in nature.

Podcast episode 46. The importance of agency and relationships: A conversation about enhancing the wellbeing of our horses with Bonny Mealand and Emily Kieson.

Carneddau ponies in the Sychnant Pass, Conwy.

I love all of my podcast episodes, but every now and again I get to record and be part of a conversation that I could have a profound influence on both me and other equestrians. This is one of those conversations.

Link to the episode https://www.buzzsprout.com/1975020/14968112

My guests on this episode are Bonny Mealand and Emily Kieson:
Bonny Mealand DEP MEPA

Bonny’s niche is trimming the hooves of wild horses, combining her extensive experience as an Equine Podiatrist , fascination with equine behaviour, and her skill as a trainer of the “untrainable”.

Her award winning work with the takhi (Equus ferus ssp.Przewalskii ) of the Highland Wildlife Park has been featured on BBC Inside the Zoo. She is a regular writer for the Concordia: A Voice for Horses magazine and runs courses teaching safe, low stress and effective handling techniques. Bonny is an advocate of ethological study and alongside Dr Emily Kieson runs “Learning Wild” equine behaviour courses. Having been involved for many years with both domestic as well as wild horses she is passionate about sharing the valuable information she has learnt and showing how inextricably linked these two worlds are.

Bonny is an enthusiastic Equine Science Masters student at The University of Edinburgh (Dick Vet). She volunteers as a welfare advisor for the BHS. She is a Somatic Yoga and Mindfulness teacher and a Retained Firefighter for the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service.

Web site – https://www.touchingwild.com/

Online Course – https://community-touchingwild.mn.co/

Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/touching_wild

Facebook (Learning Wild) – https://m.facebook.com/learning.wild.global/

Facebook (Touching Wild) – https://m.facebook.com/TouchingWild/

Emily Kieson PhD, MS, PgDip

Emily Kieson serves as Executive Director at Equine International, a US-based nonprofit focused on research, education, and outreach in the fields of equine behavior, welfare, and equine-human interactions.

Emily holds a PhD in Comparative Psychology, a MS in Psychology, and a graduate degree in Equine Science. She also holds multiple certifications in various models of equine-assisted activities and recently served as Chair of the Equine Welfare Committee with the Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship (PATH).

Her current research focuses involve looking at equine affiliative behaviors to study how horses create and maintain social bonds and how those can overlap with human affiliative behaviors for application in management, horse ownership, equine-assisted activities, and indicators of positive welfare in horses with and without humans.

She also has a passion for supporting sustainable systems of horse management and husbandry that promote physical and psychological welfare of the horse while simultaneously supporting sustainable ecosystem practices on small and large scales (for both feral and domestic equids). Emily currently develops and teaches courses at universities in the fields of psychology, animal-human interactions, animal-assisted interventions, animal behavior and training, and animal welfare and ethics.

For more information on Equine International visit equineintl.org (or equineinternational.org)
For more information on Learning Wild courses visit LearningWild.net

Related research papers:

Kieson, E, & Sams, J. (2022). Horse-Human Communication : The Roles of Language and Communication in the Context of Horse-Human Interactions. International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.23880/izab-16000414

Kieson, Emily, Felix, C., Webb, S., & Abramson, C. I. (2020). The effects of a choice test between food rewards and human interaction in a herd of domestic horses of varying breeds and experiences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 231(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105075

Kieson, Emily, & Goma, A. A. (2023). Tend and Befriend in Horses : Partner Preferences , Lateralization , and Contextualization of Allogrooming in Two Socially Stable Herds of Quarter Horse Mares.

Lansade, L., Bonneau, C., Parias, C., & Biau, S. (2019). Horse’s emotional state and rider safety during grooming practices, a field study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 217(April), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.04.017

Maeda, T., Ochi, S., Ringhofer, M., Sosa, S., Sueur, C., Hirata, S., & Yamamoto, S. (2021). Aerial drone observations identified a multilevel society in feral horses. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79790-1

Merkies, K., & Franzin, O. (2021). Enhanced understanding of horse–human interactions to optimize welfare. Animals, 11(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051347

Rudd, C., Pasiuk, E., Anderson, N., Hall, N., Foster, R., Schroeder, K., … Foster, R. (2024). A Preliminary Assessment of Equine Affect in Equine-Assisted Services A Preliminary Assessment of Equine Affect in Equine-Assisted ABSTRACT. Anthrozoös, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2024.2333163

River Tiger podcast with Dr Carl Woods

Embracing uncertainty and a response-ability to the experiences of others (human and non-human). A conversation with Dr Carl Woods

Carl Woods is a Senior Research Fellow within the Institute for Health and Sport at Victoria University. His research interests reside at the intersection of ecological psychology, social anthropology, and sport science, where he explores concepts of knowing, skill, learning, and education. He has an extensive background in both academia and the industry, having held various positions within multiple Australian Universities and the Australian Football League.

In this conversation we explore what is is to learn, become skilful and to have expertise. Particularly the notion of being comfortable with embracing uncertainty, and through dwelling with uncertainty becoming open to the experiences of others (human and non-human). This idea is particularly pertinent to those who are working and learning with non-human sentient species, such as horses and dogs.

It’s a long and fascinating conversation that touches on many topics including the difference between cues and affordances, why it matters to ensure agency in those we coach and interact with, and what it is to interact though curiosity, care and hope.

This is a fascinating conversation that might need a few sessions to listen to, or a long drive 🙂

Contacting Carl –
Carl is on Twitter – @CarlWoods25
ResearchGate